Quote about new species of fruit fly : Anthropologist Professor Jeffrey Schwartz

 

"… it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed…". 

- Jeffrey Schwartz, Professor of Anthropology , University of Pittsburgh

Quotes to Refute Evolution : Hoyle, Sir Fred, and Chandra Wickramasinghe

Hoyle, Sir Fred, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984), 176 pp.

"No matter how large the environment one considers, life cannot have had a random beginning. Troops of monkeys thundering away at random on typewriters could not produce the works of Shakespeare, for the practical reason that the whole observable universe is not large enough to contain the necessary monkey hordes, the necessary typewriters, and certainly not the waste paper baskets required for the deposition of wrong attempts. The same is true for living material."

"The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it. It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence." p. 148

Quotes on Evolution: "A Theory in Crisis (London": Burnett Books, Ltd.,1985 : .. Denton,Michael,

Denton,Michael,Evolution: "A Theory in Crisis (London": Burnett Books, Ltd.,1985

"Even today we have no way of rigorously estimating the probability or degree of isolation of even one functional protein. It is surely a little premature to claim that random processes could have assembled mosquitoes and elephants when we still have to determine the actual probability of the discovery by chance of one single functional protein molecule." p. 324

"Altogether a typical cell contains about ten million million atoms. Suppose we choose to build an exact replica to a scale one thousand million times that of the cell so that each atom of the model would be the size of a tennis ball. Constructing such a model at the rate of one atom per minute, it would take fifty million years to finish, and the object we would end up with would be the giant factory, described above, some twenty kilometres in diameter, with a volume thousands of times that of the Great Pyramid."pp. 329-330

"Altogether the total number of connections in the human brain approaches 1015 or a thousand million million. Numbers in the order of 1015 are of course completely beyond comprehension. Imagine an area about half the size of the USA (one million square miles) covered in a forest of trees containing ten thousand trees per square mile. If each tree contained one hundred thousand leaves the total number of leaves in the forest would be 1015, equivalent to the number of connections in the human brain." p. 330

"The capacity of DNA to store information vastly exceeds that of any other known system; it is so efficient that all the information needed to specify an organism as complex as man weighs less than a few thousand millionths of a gram. The information necessary to specify the design of all the species of organisms which have ever existed on the planet, a number according to G. G. Simpson of approximately one thousand million, could be held in a teaspoon and there would still be room left for all the information in every book ever written." p. 334

"It is the sheer universality of perfection, the fact that everywhere we look, to whatever depth we look, we find an elegance and ingenuity of an absolutely transcending quality, which so mitigates against the idea of chance. Is it really credible that random processes could have constructed a reality, the smallest element of which--a functional protein or gene--is complex beyond our own creative capacities, a reality which is the very antithesis of chance, which excels in every sense anything produced by the intelligence of man? Alongside the level of ingenuity and complexity exhibited by the molecular machinery of life, even our most advanced artifacts appear clumsy."
-p. 342

.. #Evolution Versus #Creation
-  Quotes .. #Research [ #EvolutionRefuted ] ...

No reputable and reliable witness physically observed the alleged long slow process of evolution..

No reputable and reliable witness physically observed the alleged different stages of the alleged long slow process of evolution from the alleged start to finish.

One would think that since evolution is taught in schools as an alleged "… established scientific fact.." that there would be some real bona fide compelling evidence to support the theory of evolution.

To date evolutionists [ for obvious reasons ] do not have a star witness who physically identified and observed [ in real time ] the alleged different stages of the alleged long slow process of evolution from the alleged start of evolution..

Evolutionists will not tell anyone who their star witness is that physically dentified the so called "..common ancestor of apes, monkeys, chimpanzees ,gorillas etc and humans...".

Evolutionists [ for obvious reasons ] are silent about the name of the said star witness. They do not provide his name or his age or his date of birth or standard of education or date of death because there is no star witness that was alive to witness the alleged start of the alleged long slow process of the alleged evolutionary process.

And to date [ for obvious reasons ] , Evolutionists do not provide any peer reviews scientific papers that meticulously document the alleged beginning of the alleged long slow process of evolution and all the alleged evolutionary stages..Why should they ?

According to Professor D.M. S. Watson :

".. Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible..".

Evolutionists are very quick to dismiss the views of any Bible Reader as unscientific. The only thing that convinces evolutionists is so called "..scientific evidence and scientific arguments..".

Obviously, the professor only appreciate so called "... logically coherent evidence ..".

Hopefully, with some reading of scientific journals, "..logically coherent evidence.." and with a better understanding of science , one day some one will show that the theory of evolution is a bad science theory.